- Additional Insured Entitled To Defense and Indemnification
- District Court May Make a Determination as to “Substantial Similarly” on a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss in a Copyright Infringement Action
- Commercial Tenant Not Entitled to the Benefit of Exemptions and Abatements Paid to Eligible Tenant-Shareholders
- Law Firm Violated Fair Debt Act by Starting Lawsuit During 30-Day Validation Period
- No Implied Contract Requiring Payment of a Placement Fee
- Payment to Court of More than Amount Necessary to Redeem Property Was Insufficient Both to Stay Foreclosure Sale and to Redeem Property
- Defendant In Foreclosure Action Entitled To Setoff Even Though It Waived That Right In Mortgage Agreement
- Procedural Error in Disciplinary Hearing Process Entitles Employee to Four Years of Back Pay and Benefits
- MORTGAGE COMMITMENT DOES NOT BIND PURCHASER BECAUSE OF CHANGE OF FACTS IN CREDIT REPORT
- A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT TO PREVENT BUSINESS COMPETITION SHALL BE ENFORCED
- Condo Unit Owner Cannot Sue Condo Board Directly for Cell Tower Lease
- Successful Bidder at Foreclosure Sale Entitled to Set Aside Sale and Get Deposit Back Based Upon Referee’s Unauthorized Actions
Subscribe 
Contact
914.682.0707
Search this Blog
Our Other Blogs
Recent Entries
- June 17, 2010 10:32 AM
Additional Insured Entitled To Defense and Indemnification Noting that it was “once again asked to determine the... - April 27, 2010 3:15 PM
District Court May Make a Determination as to “Substantial Similarly” on a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss in a Copyright Infringement Action In a matter of first impression, the United States Court... - March 25, 2010 12:56 PM
Commercial Tenant Not Entitled to the Benefit of Exemptions and Abatements Paid to Eligible Tenant-Shareholders New York’s highest court has ruled that the tax benefit... - January 14, 2010 11:07 AM
Law Firm Violated Fair Debt Act by Starting Lawsuit During 30-Day Validation Period The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit... - January 4, 2010 10:36 AM
No Implied Contract Requiring Payment of a Placement Fee The Appellate Division Second Department has ruled that there was not sufficient “assent” to require a law firm to pay a recruiting firm’s fee when the resume was sent to a partner in the firm’s New York office, but the candidate was independently interviewed and hired by the firm’s Washington D.C. office.
Legal Blogs
- New York Bankruptcy Lawyer Blog (Starr & Starr)
- California Business Lawyer Blog (Steven Peck)
- Dennis Kennedy Blog (Dennis Kennedy)
- New York Wrongful Death Lawyer Blog (Leland Williams)
- Maryland Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog (Silverman | Thompson | Slutkin | White)
- Georgia Trial Lawyer Blog (Pate & Brody)
- Insurance Dispute Lawyer Blog (Berniard Law Firm)
- inter alia (Tom Mighell)
- New York Real Estate Lawyer Blog (Klose & Associates)
- Securities Fraud Attorney Blog (Rich & Intelisano)
- Lawsuit Finance Blog (Lawsuit Financial Corp.)
- BP Oil Spill Law Blog (Charles E. Lavis)
- Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog (Steven R. Merican)
- Indiana Business Lawyer Blog (Parr Richey Obremskey Frandsen & Patterson)
- Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog (DiTommaso Lubin)
- Central New York Injury Lawyer Blog (Michaels & Smolak)
- Florida Patent Lawyer Blog (Mark Terry)
- Delaware Business Lawyer Blog (Charles Snyderman)